For coaches and teams
Fifteen athletes, one screen, four minutes
Most squad software gives you a wall of totals. What a coach actually needs before a session is narrower than that: who has moved, who has stalled, and which one piece is worth opening.
Training on your own? That path is over here →
Roster
The squad, ranked by the question you have today
Every athlete with their 500m best, average watts, stroke consistency and a ten-session trend. The consistency bar turns blue when someone has dropped below the squad's target band — the one thing you would otherwise only notice by accident.
Colour is rationed on purpose. Orange means the athlete you are looking at; grey means the squad average and never a person. If a screen is mostly grey, nothing needs you.
SAMPLE DATA Session detail
Read a piece the way it was actually produced
Power per stroke across the whole piece, coloured by how hard that stroke was, against the target. Splits beside it, with the delta coloured from under-target blue through to over-target orange.
Underneath, one sentence of diagnosis and one of prescription. Not a paragraph — a coach reading fifteen of these before practice does not need an essay per athlete.
SAMPLE DATA Compare
Two athletes, one test piece, the shape of the gap
Average watts per 500 for both, with the squad average sitting behind them as a deliberately subordinate reference. The fade panel makes first-half-to-second-half drop-off explicit, which is usually the thing the finishing time was hiding.
One athlete starts harder and gives it back after 1000. The other holds within eight watts across every split and wins by four seconds. Same test, entirely different conversation afterwards.
SAMPLE DATA The part nobody else builds
Erg output against the skiing that surrounds it
The same watch already records the on-snow sessions. So an erg test does not have to be read in isolation: you can see the week it sat in, the upper-body volume around it, and whether a flat test followed a heavy block or a light one.
It is also the reason this is built for one machine and one sport rather than for ergs in general. For a Nordic programme, what the erg predicts about the snow is the whole question. Nobody building a general indoor-training tool has any reason to answer it.
What it deliberately doesn't do
- Predict race times. With fifteen athletes over one season the claim cannot be backed, and one confident wrong number costs more trust than the feature earns.
- Guess technique from a GPS trace. Classifying double-poling against diagonal from on-snow data is tempting, unreliable, and not needed for any of this to work.
- Coach for you. These are descriptive tools for your judgement. The product's job is to put the right thing in front of you quickly, not to have an opinion.
What it costs
Free on the wrist. Per seat for the squad.
The watch app is free and stays free — an athlete should never be charged to record their own session. Coaches pay per athlete seat for the team dashboard and the ski-specific analysis.
There is no price on this page because there is not a decided one yet, and we would rather leave it blank than publish a number and then move it. Waitlist members hear it first, and the first squads on it get a season at the price they started on.
- AthleteFreeWatch app, own sessions, personal records
- CoachPer seatRoster, comparison, blocks, tests, on-snow load
- TrialYour own dataLoad a real squad and a real test before paying anything
Early access
Put your squad at the front of the queue
Tell us roughly how many athletes and which ergs you have. That is genuinely what decides what gets built next.